Testimonials Showcase for WPBakery Page Builder Plugin is a WordPress add-on that displays customer testimonials and reviews as a responsive grid, slider, or filterable list, entirely through the WPBakery drag-and-drop editor. It is aimed at site owners, freelancers, and agencies already running WPBakery who want styled testimonial sections without touching code. The plugin is sold on CodeCanyon for $18, has recorded 2,384 sales, and holds a 4.07 out of 5 rating across 54 reviews.
What the Plugin Actually Does
The core value of this plugin is that it turns testimonials into a managed content type rather than a block of hard-coded HTML. Entries are stored as a custom post type, which means each testimonial exists independently of the page it appears on. A quote can be reused across a homepage slider, a dedicated reviews page, and a product landing page without duplicating the text three times.
Display is handled through WPBakery elements. The vendor ships ten predefined responsive themes, and each one can be recoloured using ten preset colour schemes or a custom CSS field. Ten display options control which fields appear on each testimonial — logo, quote text, star rating, job title, company name, or date can be toggled individually per group. That field-level control matters more than it sounds: a B2B services site usually wants job title and company, while a consumer product page often wants stars and a date and nothing else.
Three layout modes are available. The grid showcase arranges testimonials in responsive columns. The slider showcase adds carousel behaviour with configurable transitions, navigation bullets, autoplay, loop, mouse drag, and touch drag, plus three pagination themes. The filter showcase lets visitors narrow testimonials by category, which is useful when a business serves several distinct markets or product lines and wants reviewers sorted accordingly.
Two features stand out for anyone thinking beyond presentation. The first is the submission form, which lets site visitors submit their own testimonial from the front end. Submitted entries can be held as pending for review before publication, so nothing goes live unreviewed. The second is Rich Snippets integration, which outputs structured data — the markup search engines read to display star ratings in search results. The plugin also supports aggregate ratings in that markup, which is the format Google expects when multiple reviews are summarised on one page.
Smaller conveniences round out the feature set: a “read more” toggle for long quotes, a character limit per testimonial, multiple ordering options including by last name, multi-group assignment so one testimonial can appear in several collections, WPML compatibility for multilingual sites, and built-in support for bbPress and Easy Digital Downloads. The source files — JavaScript, HTML, CSS, and PHP — are included, and the plugin is retina-ready with high-resolution assets.
Where This Plugin Fits, and Where It Does Not
This is the right purchase for a site that already uses WPBakery Page Builder and needs a testimonials section that looks designed rather than improvised. An agency building a client site on WPBakery can hand the client a working testimonials system with a familiar editing experience, since everything is configured inside the page builder the client already knows. Freelancers charging for a small business site get ten ready themes and a colour picker instead of writing custom CSS for every project.
The submission form makes it a reasonable fit for membership and community sites as well. A training provider or a directory site can invite past customers to leave a review, moderate it in the WordPress dashboard, and publish it into an existing showcase without any manual data entry.
Where it is the wrong choice is equally clear. The plugin is an add-on for WPBakery Page Builder, not a standalone tool. A site running Elementor, the WordPress block editor, or a theme with its own builder cannot use it — the vendor states plainly that WPBakery must be installed. Anyone who has moved away from WPBakery, or who is building on the native block editor, should look at a standalone testimonials plugin instead. The listing also confirms the plugin is not Gutenberg-optimised, so block-editor workflows are outside its scope.
A second caution applies to sites that depend on frequent updates. The most recent version recorded by the vendor is dated February 2022. The compatibility list covers WordPress 5.9 through 6.6, so it works on current releases, but the update cadence has slowed considerably compared with the years of regular releases that preceded it.
Strengths and Limitations
Strengths
- Testimonials are stored as reusable content, so one entry can feed multiple pages and layouts without duplication.
- Field-level display control per group — logo, stars, job, company, and date can each be switched on or off independently.
- Three genuinely different presentation modes (grid, slider, filter) rather than one layout with cosmetic variations.
- Front-end submission form with a moderation queue, which turns testimonials into an ongoing collection process rather than a one-off build.
- Rich Snippets output, including aggregate ratings, which is the mechanism that can surface star ratings in search results.
- WPML compatibility and source files included, both of which matter for multilingual builds and for developers who need to adjust styling.
- Broad browser support extending back to Internet Explorer 9, relevant for organisations still supporting legacy environments.
Limitations
- It cannot function without WPBakery Page Builder. That is a hard dependency, not a soft preference, and the page builder is a separate paid purchase.
- No Gutenberg or block-editor support. On a mixed site, testimonial sections will live in WPBakery rows while the rest of the content uses blocks, which can feel inconsistent.
- The vendor’s own roadmap mentions a template preview system as a future feature, which indicates the theme selection process is currently less visual than it could be.
- The last recorded update is from February 2022. Buyers should confirm current compatibility with their WordPress version before committing, since the vendor does not publish a forward-looking support commitment on the listing.
- The rating sits at 4.07 out of 5 across 54 reviews. That is solid but not exceptional, and it suggests a portion of buyers encountered friction the marketing copy does not mention.
- Design output is constrained to the ten included themes and ten preset colour schemes. Sites with a highly specific design system will likely need the custom CSS field.
How It Compares to the Wider Category
Testimonials plugins generally fall into two groups. The first is standalone plugins that work with any theme or builder, usually offering a shortcode or block plus a settings screen. The second is builder-specific add-ons like this one, which trade portability for tighter integration.
The standalone route wins on flexibility. A shortcode-based plugin keeps working if the site later migrates from WPBakery to another builder, and it usually plays better with the block editor. That matters for anyone who expects the site to be rebuilt or handed to a different team within a few years.
The builder-specific route wins on editing experience. Because Testimonials Showcase registers native WPBakery elements, the testimonial layout is configured in the same visual interface as the rest of the page. There is no shortcode syntax to remember, no context switching between the page builder and a plugin settings screen, and the result is visible in the live preview as it is built. For a team standardised on WPBakery, that consistency is the whole point.
On capability, this plugin covers more ground than a basic shortcode alternative. Grid, slider, and filter modes, a moderated submission form, multi-group assignment, and Rich Snippets are a substantial set for the price. The trade-off is the dependency and the update cadence, not the feature list.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Testimonials Showcase work without WPBakery Page Builder?
No. The plugin is built as an add-on for WPBakery Page Builder and its testimonial elements only appear inside that editor. WPBakery itself is a separate paid plugin and must be installed and active. Sites running Elementor, Divi, or the default WordPress block editor cannot use this plugin at all.
Can visitors submit their own testimonials through the site?
Yes. The plugin includes a front-end submission form, and submitted entries can be routed into a pending queue for review before they appear publicly. That lets a site collect reviews continuously and moderate them from the WordPress dashboard, rather than asking customers to send text by email and adding it manually.
Will the testimonials show star ratings in Google search results?
That is what the Rich Snippets feature is for. The plugin outputs structured data, including aggregate ratings, which is the markup search engines read to display review stars. Whether stars actually appear depends on Google’s own eligibility rules and the page’s overall markup, so the plugin provides the data rather than a guarantee.
Is the plugin compatible with the current version of WordPress?
The vendor lists compatibility from WordPress 5.9 through 6.6, so it covers recent releases. The most recent update on record is from February 2022, however, and the vendor does not state a support commitment beyond that. Buyers running the newest WordPress version should test on a staging site before deploying to a live one.
Verdict
Testimonials Showcase for WPBakery Page Builder Plugin is a sensible buy for anyone already committed to WPBakery who wants testimonials handled as managed content rather than pasted markup. The combination of grid, slider, and filter layouts, a moderated submission form, and Rich Snippets output covers the practical needs of most business, service, and membership sites at a low one-time price. The 2,384 sales and 4.07 rating suggest a product that has been widely used and broadly satisfied its buyers, without being flawless.
It is the wrong purchase for sites not running WPBakery, for anyone working primarily in the block editor, and for projects that require an actively maintained plugin with a predictable release schedule. The dependency on a separate paid page builder is the deciding factor: if WPBakery is already part of the stack, this fits neatly; if it is not, the cost and complexity of adding it rarely makes sense for testimonials alone.
